Patient and carer perspectives on the use of video consultations in the management of the ketogenic diet for epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a significant change in the way healthcare was delivered worldwide. During this time, a survey of Ketogenic Dietitians Research Network (KDRN) members found that all respondents expected digital platforms for clinics and/or education to continue post-pandemic. As a follow-up to this, we surveyed views about video consultations (VCs) of patients and carers of those following the ketogenic diet for drug-resistant epilepsy. METHODS: The SurveymonkeyTM survey was distributed on Matthews' Friends and KDRN social media platforms and emailed from five United Kingdom ketogenic diet centers to their patients/carers. RESULTS: Forty eligible responses were received. More than half of the respondents (23, 57.5%) had attended a VC. Eighteen respondents (45%) would like to have VCs for most (categorized as approximately 75%) or all of their consultations. Half as many (9, 22.5%) would not like video consultations. The most common benefits selected were saving travel time (32, 80%), less stress of finding somewhere to park and not having to take time off work (22, 55% each). Twelve (30%) responded that VCs lessened environmental impact. The most common disadvantages selected were not being able to get blood tests/having to make a separate consultation for blood tests (22, 55% overall), not being able to get weight or height checked/having to make a separate consultation for this and it is less personal/preferring face-to-face (17, 42.5% each). Three-quarters (30 respondents) felt it would be very easy or easy to accurately weigh the patient when not attending an in-person consultation. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that many patients and carers would welcome the option of VCs as well as face-to-face consultations. Where possible and appropriate patients and their families should be offered both options. This is in line with the NHS Long-Term Plan and the NHS response to climate change.

The impacts of COVID-19 on structural inequities faced by people living with HIV who inject drugs: A qualitative study in St. Petersburg, Russia.

BACKGROUND: People who inject drugs (PWID) living with HIV may be disproportionately impacted by pandemic restrictions. This study qualitatively explored the impacts of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on PWID with HIV in St. Petersburg, Russia. METHODS: In March and April 2021, we conducted remote, semi-structured interviews with PWID with HIV, health care providers, and harm reductionists. RESULTS: We interviewed 25 PWID with HIV (aged 28-56 years, 46% female) and 11 providers. The pandemic exacerbated economic and psychological challenges experienced by PWID with HIV. Simultaneously, barriers to HIV care access, ART prescription refill and dispensing and police violence, which hindered the health and safety of PWID with HIV, were themselves hindered from normal operations by the pandemic, significantly reducing these burdens. CONCLUSION: Pandemic responses should account for the unique vulnerabilities of PWID with HIV to avoid worsening the structural violence they already experience. Wherever the pandemic decreased structural barriers, such as institutional, administrative, and bureaucratic challenges and state violence enacted by police and other elements of the criminal justice system, such changes should be protected.

Substance use policy and practice in the COVID-19 pandemic: Learning from early pandemic responses through internationally comparative field data.

The COVID-19 pandemic has created an unprecedented natural experiment in drug policy, treatment delivery, and harm reduction strategies by exposing wide variation in public health infrastructures and social safety nets around the world. Using qualitative data including ethnographic methods, questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews with people who use drugs (PWUD) and Delphi-method with experts from field sites spanning 13 different countries, this paper compares national responses to substance use during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Field data was collected by the Substance Use x COVID-19 (SU x COVID) Data Collaborative, an international network of social scientists, public health scientists, and community health practitioners convened to identify and contextualise health service delivery models and social protections that influence the health and wellbeing of PWUD during COVID-19. Findings suggest that countries with stronger social welfare systems pre-COVID introduced durable interventions targeting structural drivers of health. Countries with fragmented social service infrastructures implemented temporary initiatives for PWUD led by non-governmental organisations. The paper summarises the most successful early pandemic responses seen across countries and ends by calling for greater systemic investments in social protections for PWUD, diversion away from criminal-legal systems toward health interventions, and integrated harm reduction, treatment and recovery supports for PWUD.

Highly socially vulnerable communities exhibit disproportionately increased viral loads as measured in community wastewater.

Wastewater surveillance has proven to be a useful tool for evidence-based epidemiology in the fight against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It is particularly useful at the population level where acquisition of individual test samples may be time or cost-prohibitive. Wastewater surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 has typically been performed at wastewater treatment plants; however, this study was designed to sample on a local level to monitor the spread of the virus among three communities with distinct social vulnerability indices in Shreveport, Louisiana, located in a socially vulnerable region of the United States. Twice-monthly grab samples were collected from September 30, 2020, to March 23, 2021, during the Beta wave of the pandemic. The goals of the study were to examine whether: 1) concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater varied with social vulnerability indices and, 2) the time lag of spikes differed during wastewater monitoring in the distinct communities. The size of the population contributing to each sample was assessed via the quantification of the pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV), which was significantly higher in the less socially vulnerable community. We found that the communities with higher social vulnerability exhibited greater viral loads as assessed by wastewater when normalized with PMMoV (Kruskal-Wallis, p < 0.05). The timing of the spread of the virus through the three communities appeared to be similar. These results suggest that interconnected communities within a municipality experienced the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus at similar times, but areas of high social vulnerability experienced more intense wastewater viral loads.

Whose Concerns? It's Time to Adjust the Lens of Research on Police-Involved Overdose Response

(p. 1326) creatively use body-worn camera footage- a previously unused data source-to support the following findings of previous research: (1) police can administer naloxone during an overdose, (2) combativeness toward first responders by overdose survivors is rare, (3) drug exposure is nota risk to police officers, and (4) arrests do occur at the scene of overdose emergencies as the result of police presence.1,2 Although we recognize this article's contribution to the growing literature on law enforcement involvement in overdose response, we would caution policymakers about using the findings of this study to bolster (or worse, solely rely on) the role of police in overdose response. White et al. document that arrest- of both overdose victims and other bystanders-does indeed occur. [...]their conclusion that concerns about police-administered naloxone are "overstated" is dismissive of the most problematic and disruptive concern examined in the study. The disproportionate risk of violence at the hands of police is a powerful deterrent to inviting law enforcement interaction (specifically by calling 911)-one that cannot be resolved by the limited protections provided by most 911 Good Samaritan laws.10 Furthermore, druginduced homicide investigations not only directly undermine the protective mechanisms of 911 Good Samaritan laws5 but are also disproportionately used against non-White persons-and almost exclusively in response to the preventable overdose deaths of White persons.11 Disproportionate policing, police violence, and incarceration of Black and Indigenous persons affect these groups' access to overdose prevention interventions, broadly, and to naloxone, specifically, especially in cases when the nearest available naloxone rests in the hands of police. Black and Indigenous people have the highest fatal overdose rates and are least served by resource allocations that further support police involvement in overdose response. [...]methodologically sound and Black and Indigenous PWUD-informed research indicates otherwise, policymakers and resource allocation decision-makers should consider any life-saving gains via police-involved overdose response to be disproportionately unavailable and inaccessible to Black and Indigenous people.

The Bronze Age of drug checking: barriers and facilitators to implementing advanced drug checking amidst police violence and COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES: Unpredictable fluctuations in the illicit drug market increase overdose risk. Drug checking, or the use of technology to provide insight into the contents of illicit drug products, is an overdose prevention strategy with an emerging evidence base. The use of portable spectrometry devices to provide point-of-service analysis of the contents of illicit drugs been adopted by harm reduction organizations internationally but is only emerging in the United States. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators of implementing drug checking services with spectrometry devices in an urban harm reduction organization and syringe service program serving economically marginalized people who use drugs in Boston, Massachusetts (USA). METHODS: In-vivo observations and semi-structured interviews with harm reduction staff and participants were conducted between March 2019 and December 2020. We used the consolidated framework for implementation research to identify implementation barriers and facilitators. RESULTS: This implementation effort was facilitated by the organization's shared culture of harm reduction-which fostered shared implementation goals and beliefs about the intervention among staff persons-its horizontal organizational structure, strong identification with the organization among staff, and strong relationships with external funders. Barriers to implementation included the technological complexity of the advanced spectroscopy devices utilized for drug checking. Program staff indicated that commercially available spectroscopy devices are powerful but not always well-suited for drug checking efforts, describing their technological capacities as "the Bronze Age of Drug Checking." Other significant barriers include the legal ambiguity of drug checking services, disruptive and oppositional police activity, and the responses and programmatic changes demanded by the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: For harm reduction organizations to be successful in efforts to implement and scale drug checking services, these critical barriers-especially regressive policing policies and prohibitive costs-need to be addressed. Future research on the impact of policy changes to reduce the criminalization of substance use or to provide explicit legal frameworks for the provision of this and other harm reduction services may be merited.

Socioeconomic impact of COVID-19 and willingness to be vaccinated in African American/Black and Hispanic/Latinx adults.

PURPOSE: To describe the socioeconomic and healthcare-related effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, and willingness to receive a free COVID-19 vaccine, among African American/Black (AA/B) and Hispanic/Latinx (H/L) adults with asthma currently enrolled in a large trial. METHODS: The present analysis is a sub-study of the PeRson EmPowered Asthma RElief (PREPARE) study, a pragmatic study of 1201 AA/B and H/L adults with asthma. A monthly questionnaire was completed by a subset of PREPARE participants (n = 325) during May-August, 2020. The 5-item questionnaire assessed self-reported impact of COVID-19 on respondents' ability to obtain asthma medications, medical care quality, employment, income and ability to pay bills; and willingness to get a free COVID-19 vaccine. Bivariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed to investigate factors associated with vaccine hesitancy. RESULTS: Of 325 survey respondents (25% AA/B, 75% H/L), the majority reported no impact of COVID-19 on medical care or ability to get asthma medications. Approximately half of employed respondents experienced a lower level of employment or job loss, and approximately half reported having difficulty paying bills during the pandemic. Thirty-five percent of respondents reported unwillingness and 31% reported being somewhat likely to receive a free COVID-19 vaccine. AA/B race/ethnicity and poorer reported physical health were associated with a higher likelihood of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. CONCLUSION: AA/B and H/L adults with asthma may experience changes in the quality of their asthma care and increased socioeconomic stressors as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and may be hesitant or unwilling to receive a COVID-19 vaccine.

Factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients attending an acute hospital ambulatory assessment unit.

To describe the factors associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in mild-to-moderate patients attending for assessment. This observational study was conducted in a Model 4 tertiary referral center in Ireland. All patients referred for SARS-CoV-2 assessment over a 4-week period were included. Patient demographics, presenting symptoms, comorbidities, medications, and outcomes (including length of stay, discharge, and mortality) were collected. Two hundred and seventy-nine patients were assessed. These patients were predominantly female (62%) with a median age of 50 years (SD 16.9). Nineteen (6.8%) patients had SARS-CoV-2 detected. Dysgeusia was associated with a 16-fold increased prediction of SARS-CoV-2 positivity (p = .001; OR, 16.8; 95% CI, 3.82-73.84). Thirteen patients with SARS-COV-2 detected (68.4%) were admitted, in contrast with 38.1% (99/260) of patients with SARS-CoV-2 non-detectable or not tested (p = .001). Female patients were more likely to be hospitalized (p = .01) as were current and ex-smokers (p = .05). We describe olfactory disturbance and fever as the main presenting features in SARS-CoV-2 infection. These patients are more likely to be hospitalized with increased length of stay; however, they make up a minority of the patients assessed. "Non-detectable" patients remain likely to require prolonged hospitalization. Knowledge of predictors of hospitalization in a "non-detectable" cohort will aid future planning and discussion of patient assessment in a SARS-CoV-2 era.

COVID-19's Financial Impact on Primary Care Clinicians and Practices.

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disrupted and undermined primary care delivery. The goal of this study was to examine the financial impacts the pandemic has had on primary care clinicians and practices. METHODS: The American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network and the Robert Graham Center distributed weekly surveys from March 27, 2020, through June 15, 2020, to a network of more than 1960 physicians. Responses to the question, "Could you please tell us about any financial impact the COVID-19 pandemic has had on your practice, if any?" were analyzed using a grounded theory approach of qualitative analysis. The number of unique respondents who answered the financial impact question totaled 461 over the 12 weeks. RESULTS: Severe declines in patient visits, causing drastic revenue reductions, greatly impacted the ability to serve patients. Primary care clinicians and practices experienced significant changes in several areas about financial implications: patient visits, financial strain, staffing and telehealth. DISCUSSION: Preliminary findings revealed that even with Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, also known as CARES Act, funding, business viability remains questionable for some primary care practices. CONCLUSIONS: Low patient visits directly resulted in decreased revenues, which in turn, impacted staffing decisions and fueled telehealth implementation. It is difficult to predict whether patient visits will increase after June. Alternate payment models could provide some financial stability and address business viability.